article Generative AI Drug Discovery

Generative Models as an Emerging Paradigm in the Chemical Sciences

Dylan M. Anstine, Olexandr Isayev

Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 145 (16) pp. 8736–8750 2023 231 citations

Abstract

Traditional computational approaches to design chemical species are limited by the need to compute properties for a vast number of candidates, e.g., by discriminative modeling. Therefore, inverse design methods aim to start from the desired property and optimize a corresponding chemical structure. From a machine learning viewpoint, the inverse design problem can be addressed through so-called generative modeling. Mathematically, discriminative models are defined by learning the probability distribution function of properties given the molecular or material structure. In contrast, a generative model seeks to exploit the joint probability of a chemical species with target characteristics. The overarching idea of generative modeling is to implement a system that produces novel compounds that are expected to have a desired set of chemical features, effectively sidestepping issues found in the forward design process. In this contribution, we overview and critically analyze popular generative algorithms like generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, flow, and diffusion models. We highlight key differences between each of the models, provide insights into recent success stories, and discuss outstanding challenges for realizing generative modeling discovered solutions in chemical applications.

Keywords

Cite This Paper

@article{Anstine2023generative,
  author = {Anstine, Dylan M. and Isayev, Olexandr},
  title = {Generative Models as an Emerging Paradigm in the Chemical Sciences},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Journal of the American Chemical Society},
  volume = {145},
  number = {16},
  pages = {8736--8750},
  doi = {10.1021/jacs.2c13467},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c13467},
  publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
  keywords = {generative-modeling, inverse-design-methods, molecular-generation, virtual-screening, admet-properties},
  researchAreas = {generative-ai, drug-discovery},
  citations = {231}
}

Related Research Areas

Related Publications

2022
cited 84

Generative and reinforcement learning approaches for the automated de novo design of bioactive compounds

Korshunova M. , Huang N. , Capuzzi S. , Radchenko D. S. , Savych O. , Moroz Y. S. , Wells C. I. , Willson T. M. , Tropsha A. , Isayev O.

Communications Chemistry , 5 (2022)

Generative Ai
Drug Discovery
DOI
2022
cited 225

The transformational role of GPU computing and deep learning in drug discovery

Pandey M. , Fernandez M. , Gentile F. , Isayev O. , Tropsha A. , Stern A. C. , Cherkasov A.

Nature Machine Intelligence , 4 , 211–221 (2022)

Drug Discovery
Generative Ai
DOI
2018
cited 1196

Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design

Popova M. , Isayev O. , Tropsha A.

Science Advances , 4 (2018)

Generative Ai
Drug Discovery
DOI
2024

Integrating QSAR modelling and deep learning in drug discovery: the emergence of deep QSAR

Tropsha A. , Isayev O. , Varnek A. , Schneider G. , Cherkasov A.

Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. (2024)

Drug Discovery
Generative Ai
Quantum Chemistry
DOI
2019
cited 8

Inter-Modular Linkers play a crucial role in governing the biosynthesis of non-ribosomal peptides

Farag S. , Bleich R. M. , Shank E. A. , Isayev O. , Bowers A. A. , Tropsha A.

Bioinformatics , 35 , 3584–3591 (2019)

Drug Discovery
Generative Ai
DOI